Wednesday, August 14, 2019

“Did Googler’s Tweet Imply Google Doesn’t Catch All Paid Links? - Search Engine Journal” plus 2 more

“Did Googler’s Tweet Imply Google Doesn’t Catch All Paid Links? - Search Engine Journal” plus 2 more


Did Googler’s Tweet Imply Google Doesn’t Catch All Paid Links? - Search Engine Journal

Posted: 14 Aug 2019 02:19 AM PDT

A tweet by Google's Gary Illyes implied that Google doesn't catch all paid links. The tweet was thanking someone for submitting a list of 700 domains that sold links. That implied that the links passed PageRank and Google didn't know about them.

Google's Gary Illyes Tweet About Paid Links

Google's Webmaster Trend Analyst Gary Illyes tweet thanked someone for revealing 700 link selling domains. But it also revealed that the paid links on those domains had been passing PageRank.

This is what Gary Illyes tweeted:

"Hey Jon! I don't know if this will reach you, but your email address bounces. Just wanted to say thank you very much for sending over that spreadsheet with over 700 link seller domains! We made sure their links are worthless!"

screenshot of a tweet by Google's Gary Illyes about a paid link network Google made worthless

The part where Gary says, "We made sure their links are worthless!" appears to imply that the paid links had value before to receiving the spreadsheet with the list of 700 domains that sold links. The implication is that Google made the paid links worthless after receiving the spreadsheet.

Gary did not say those links previously had value. It is implied.

Illyes also did not say that those links were helping sites rank. He only said that they "made sure" that the links were now worthless.  That's a little ambiguous but it does imply the links still passed some worth.

It could be that Google had already caught those links and devalued them and that Google made all outbound links no longer count, including the paid links they had already count.

But… Gary's tweet implies the links may have been passing link signals because his tweed said Google had made sure their links were now "worthless." That means they previously had worth and now had no worth.

What motivated this mysterious "Jon" who submitted 700 link selling domains? Was he a competitor of the site that was benefiting from paid links? Or was he another link seller sabotaging a competitor?

How Were the Paid Links Reported?

Google has a way for publishers to report paid links through the search console. Strangely, Gary's tweet indicated that the email address on record bounced. One would assume that the email address associated with a Google Search Console account would be valid.

So it's strange that Illyes tweeted that the email bounced.

Does Google Catch Paid Links?

I don't pay for links. I've been doing SEO for almost two decades and have been active in the community for a similar period. I know many people and I hear things.

Publishers and SEOs have said that paid links embedded in content from big brand authoritative sites tend to work. But Google catches some of them after a couple months.

Links from less authoritative sites tend to have at best zero effect to at worst an almost immediate negative effect.

Gary Illyes' tweet was somewhat surprising. It implied that Google doesn't catch all paid links.  Google's Gary Illyes many not have meant to communicate that Google doesn't catch all paid links. Yet the subtext is there that the links were worthless after Google received and processed the spreadsheet.

Read the Twitter discussion here:
https://twitter.com/methode/status/1161505935388545024?s=20

GRAPHIC: Man charged with two counts of rape, search uncovers defense statement - KAIT

Posted: 13 Aug 2019 07:15 PM PDT

[unable to retrieve full-text content]GRAPHIC: Man charged with two counts of rape, search uncovers defense statement  KAIT

An Independence County man is charged with rape and a search uncovers a defense statement, along with pornographic images, scenes.

Video: Google Indexing Bug, Google Search Podcasts, Evergreen GoogleBot, SEO, Google Ads, Maps & More - Search Engine Roundtable

Posted: 09 Aug 2019 06:35 AM PDT

This week I mentioned the monthly Google webmaster report I posted. Google also had another indexing bug where it was not able to index new content for a 24 hour period, it does seem to be resolved now. Google updated its algorithm to show less pornography for some queries. Google added podcast search features to Google search. Google dropped the magnifying glass for the words search in its search bar. Google said it doesn't show you Google Assistant responses in Google Search Console reporting. Google Search Console is now sending out monthly performance reports. Google's tools now support the evergreen GoogleBot, but the evergreen GoogleBot is now still on Chrome 75 and not on Chrome 76 yet. Google says they do not index parts of a page independently. Google said word count is not a ranking factor. Google also said when using images for links, make sure to add alt text to those images. Google launched that image search preview sticky feature. Google also launched Google's question hub which answers so many questions I had over the past two years. Google wants to know what you want them to put on the Google Search developer portal. Google said 65% of all searches are now mobile, really? Google Ads is telling agency clients directly no to specific requests, which is super bad. Google Ads launched a visual map for account structures. Google Maps added the new AR feature, tons of travel tools and features as well. Google My Business launched messaging insights and other features.. Google Local pack is testing more carousel features. Google My Business has a missing store code bug. Take Rand Fishkin's search ranking survey. Also did you miss the vlogs with Paul Shapiro and Mary Bowling? That was this past week in search at the Search Engine Roundtable.

Make sure to subscribe to our video feed or subscribe directly on iTunes to be notified of these updates and download the video in the background. Here is the YouTube version of the feed:

For the original iTunes version, click here.

Search Topics of Discussion:

Please do subscribe via iTunes or on your favorite RSS reader. Don't forget to comment below with the right answer and good luck!

“Did Googler’s Tweet Imply Google Doesn’t Catch All Paid Links? - Search Engine Journal” plus 2 more


Did Googler’s Tweet Imply Google Doesn’t Catch All Paid Links? - Search Engine Journal

Posted: 14 Aug 2019 02:19 AM PDT

A tweet by Google's Gary Illyes implied that Google doesn't catch all paid links. The tweet was thanking someone for submitting a list of 700 domains that sold links. That implied that the links passed PageRank and Google didn't know about them.

Google's Gary Illyes Tweet About Paid Links

Google's Webmaster Trend Analyst Gary Illyes tweet thanked someone for revealing 700 link selling domains. But it also revealed that the paid links on those domains had been passing PageRank.

This is what Gary Illyes tweeted:

"Hey Jon! I don't know if this will reach you, but your email address bounces. Just wanted to say thank you very much for sending over that spreadsheet with over 700 link seller domains! We made sure their links are worthless!"

screenshot of a tweet by Google's Gary Illyes about a paid link network Google made worthless

The part where Gary says, "We made sure their links are worthless!" appears to imply that the paid links had value before to receiving the spreadsheet with the list of 700 domains that sold links. The implication is that Google made the paid links worthless after receiving the spreadsheet.

Gary did not say those links previously had value. It is implied.

Illyes also did not say that those links were helping sites rank. He only said that they "made sure" that the links were now worthless.  That's a little ambiguous but it does imply the links still passed some worth.

It could be that Google had already caught those links and devalued them and that Google made all outbound links no longer count, including the paid links they had already count.

But… Gary's tweet implies the links may have been passing link signals because his tweed said Google had made sure their links were now "worthless." That means they previously had worth and now had no worth.

What motivated this mysterious "Jon" who submitted 700 link selling domains? Was he a competitor of the site that was benefiting from paid links? Or was he another link seller sabotaging a competitor?

How Were the Paid Links Reported?

Google has a way for publishers to report paid links through the search console. Strangely, Gary's tweet indicated that the email address on record bounced. One would assume that the email address associated with a Google Search Console account would be valid.

So it's strange that Illyes tweeted that the email bounced.

Does Google Catch Paid Links?

I don't pay for links. I've been doing SEO for almost two decades and have been active in the community for a similar period. I know many people and I hear things.

Publishers and SEOs have said that paid links embedded in content from big brand authoritative sites tend to work. But Google catches some of them after a couple months.

Links from less authoritative sites tend to have at best zero effect to at worst an almost immediate negative effect.

Gary Illyes' tweet was somewhat surprising. It implied that Google doesn't catch all paid links.  Google's Gary Illyes many not have meant to communicate that Google doesn't catch all paid links. Yet the subtext is there that the links were worthless after Google received and processed the spreadsheet.

Read the Twitter discussion here:
https://twitter.com/methode/status/1161505935388545024?s=20

GRAPHIC: Man charged with two counts of rape, search uncovers defense statement - KAIT

Posted: 13 Aug 2019 07:15 PM PDT

[unable to retrieve full-text content]GRAPHIC: Man charged with two counts of rape, search uncovers defense statement  KAIT

An Independence County man is charged with rape and a search uncovers a defense statement, along with pornographic images, scenes.

Video: Google Indexing Bug, Google Search Podcasts, Evergreen GoogleBot, SEO, Google Ads, Maps & More - Search Engine Roundtable

Posted: 09 Aug 2019 06:35 AM PDT

This week I mentioned the monthly Google webmaster report I posted. Google also had another indexing bug where it was not able to index new content for a 24 hour period, it does seem to be resolved now. Google updated its algorithm to show less pornography for some queries. Google added podcast search features to Google search. Google dropped the magnifying glass for the words search in its search bar. Google said it doesn't show you Google Assistant responses in Google Search Console reporting. Google Search Console is now sending out monthly performance reports. Google's tools now support the evergreen GoogleBot, but the evergreen GoogleBot is now still on Chrome 75 and not on Chrome 76 yet. Google says they do not index parts of a page independently. Google said word count is not a ranking factor. Google also said when using images for links, make sure to add alt text to those images. Google launched that image search preview sticky feature. Google also launched Google's question hub which answers so many questions I had over the past two years. Google wants to know what you want them to put on the Google Search developer portal. Google said 65% of all searches are now mobile, really? Google Ads is telling agency clients directly no to specific requests, which is super bad. Google Ads launched a visual map for account structures. Google Maps added the new AR feature, tons of travel tools and features as well. Google My Business launched messaging insights and other features.. Google Local pack is testing more carousel features. Google My Business has a missing store code bug. Take Rand Fishkin's search ranking survey. Also did you miss the vlogs with Paul Shapiro and Mary Bowling? That was this past week in search at the Search Engine Roundtable.

Make sure to subscribe to our video feed or subscribe directly on iTunes to be notified of these updates and download the video in the background. Here is the YouTube version of the feed:

For the original iTunes version, click here.

Search Topics of Discussion:

Please do subscribe via iTunes or on your favorite RSS reader. Don't forget to comment below with the right answer and good luck!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.